19 Nov 2008

Learning Styles 6 – Deep Learning. How deep is too deep?

Finally we come to the last of the LSP styles for channelling the basic learning drive (also called sensation seeking). This is the deep learning style. Deep learning is pure learning for its own sake – learning because you love learning for the intellectual interest, rather than as a means to an end. In some ways, deep learning is the opposite of goal orientation.

The positive of deep learning is that the learner will gain greater insight and understanding of a subject. They will read around the subject, chase up odd facts and ask questions about what they have already learnt. The deep learner is thus able to grow a rich and complex picture of their subject, or in the jargon of educational psychology, a rich semantic network. The great advantage of this is two fold. Firstly the personal satisfaction of learning a subject well can be profound, but secondly it can have great practical benefits when applying the material, as the learner has a reserve of knowledge and understanding which they can bring to bear on unexpected problems, which might flummox the purely goal-orientated learner.

So it’s all good, no? Well no. Deep learning involves making a deep investment in a subject. Deep investments can provide great returns, but like any investment they also involve an element of risk. While you are spending hours pouring over all those fascinating details and chasing up those wonderful intricate tangents, what’s happening to the goal? And what’s happening to the rest of your team members? A deep intellectual investment has to be judged like a financial investment – are you likely to get a return on the investment, and are you likely to get it quickly enough to be worthwhile? Answer that, and you know how much personal time and energy it’s worth for you and your desired outcome.

12 Nov 2008

Learning Styles 5 – Emotional intelligence. Can you be too dispassionate?

The fourth channel for our natural curiosity, or sensation seeking drive, which the Learning Styles Profile (LSP), proposes is the fundamental in built learning drive is emotional intelligence – the tendency to apply logical thought to new information to make sense of it. Emotional intelligence is the ability to think dispassionately about new information, so that even information which you might otherwise have strong feelings about, can be considered and analysed rationally.

As I’ve mentioned with all of the other driver channels, each of them have their positives and negatives. The positives are usually obvious – as in this case. But what is the negative side of dispassionate analysis? Well, in this case, the problems can arise where emotional engagement is a positive motivational or contextualising element. This may apply either to your subject matter or the situation in which you are working. Excessive disengagement may leave you feeling that the subject matter is not personally important, which can leave you with a sense of emptiness. If you are working with other people, it can impair your ability to develop effective relationships. In the worst case, people may shun you, as they see you as either uninterested or just emotionally cold.

So, while emotional control is a useful tool, beware of being too dispassionate if a little emotional colour would be valuable.